These arguments are in some ways
similar to those which stress the importance of the resource-based view or of
the role of knowledge and the importance of ‘dynamic capability’. Dynamic capability was defined by Teece et
al. as a ‘firm’s ability to integrate, build and reconfigure internal and external
competences to address rapidly changing environments’ (1997, p. 516). It
suggests that intangible assets, including the knowledge and skills of the
workforce, can be configured so that traditional routines do not hamper
responses to rapidly changing environments. Instead, more flexible,
meta-routines can be created which enable organisations to be capable of a
higher state of responsiveness to inherently unpredictable forces. Failure to
attract, retain and motivate the right numbers and right kinds of people means
that opportunities are missed and that other resources are wasted.
HR matters too, it is argued, in the way it can affect customer outcomes
– that is the customer experience. The connections that lead from one to
the other have been explored by a number of researchers and management
consultancies. In Figure 2.1 below, Bowen and Pugh (2009) show the potential
linkages across business strategy, employees’ perceptions of human resource
management practices, the organisational climates that are shaped considerably
by these HRM perceptions and customer outcomes such as satisfaction, quality
perceptions, loyalty, and even profitability.
No comments:
Post a Comment