Record keeping
- Recorded measures can multiply over time with the original reasons for keeping the records being lost.
- When relied on alone as a source of information, changes in recorded measures can be hard to interpret.
- Can be costly in terms of resources.
- Can be hard to analyse objectively.
- If only a small number of interviews are carried out, the results may be untypical.
- Interviewees are sometimes reluctant to reveal their real opinions, especially to an internal evaluator.
- If participants work together they may feel constrained not to express their real views.
- Expert facilitation is needed.
- It is time consuming to identify, locate and analyse all relevant documents.
- Documents may present a distorted picture of the past.
- The act of observation may change behaviour.
- It can be time consuming, stressful for those observed and ethically problematic.
- What is observed may be untypical.
- It can be hard to get good response rates unless those targeted find the questionnaire user friendly and interesting to complete.
- It can be hard to address complex issues in this way.
- It may require outside expertise to carry out questionnaires effectively.
- It may take quite some time between commissioning and feedback.
- It can be hard to judge what might be relevant comparisons to make.
- It can be easy to rely on key statistics without understanding the context of the organisations with which you are making comparisons.
- It may be difficult to access appropriate comparative data.
No comments:
Post a Comment